Why is it that the non-religious think that their opinions are the only opinions that matter?
They get all butt-hurt over someone referring to the 10 commandments, but jump all over anyone who suggests that “if they don’t like it, just ignore it.” Then they get all offensive and throw condoms at underage girls.
Anyone is free to practice their religion in whatever way they see fit (within the law of course). However not all opinions are to be taken as equal. Some, like dogmatic religious views, are stupid/harmful. Only takes a little bit of common sense to see that.
If you’re the one getting “butthurt” over the right to anyone else practicing their first amendment rights to criticize religious views, get a less stupid religion.
I’d say the indecency of the catholic church towards children is a much less manufactured wedge issue. But hey, thanks for playing along in this farce.
No, that would be bringing up “WHAT ABOUT THE CHILDREN” to win your argument. It’s called a red hearing. At the route of this is the Catholic church trying to impose their morality on those who don’t share it. Freedom of religion is a two way street.
You are right about the two way street and Obama trying to impose HIS morality, or lack thereof, on the Cathoic church is what is being pointed out. So thank you for making my point for me.
Subscribe
Oh no, the religious are offended. THINK OF THE CHILDREN.
Why is it that the non-religious think that their opinions are the only opinions that matter?
They get all butt-hurt over someone referring to the 10 commandments, but jump all over anyone who suggests that “if they don’t like it, just ignore it.” Then they get all offensive and throw condoms at underage girls.
You’ve got some anger issues there.
Anyone is free to practice their religion in whatever way they see fit (within the law of course). However not all opinions are to be taken as equal. Some, like dogmatic religious views, are stupid/harmful. Only takes a little bit of common sense to see that.
If you’re the one getting “butthurt” over the right to anyone else practicing their first amendment rights to criticize religious views, get a less stupid religion.
Thank you for this cartoon. It’s nice to know that someone with some real artistic talent is paying attention and getting the message out.
“You’ve got some anger issues there.”
Yes. When people are behaving like these schmucks did to those poor girls, I tend to get more than a little irritated.
http://i.imgur.com/nisBX.jpg
Spare me.
Nice pic.
Of course acknowledging the indecency of those whose opinions you happen to agree with, is too much to ask for.
I’d say the indecency of the catholic church towards children is a much less manufactured wedge issue. But hey, thanks for playing along in this farce.
Of course. We were talking about something else entirely and not the specific event mentioned in the cartoon above.
Thanks for pointing that out. Here i thought you had just changed the subject on me instead of admitting that you had lost an argument. Oh well.
No, that would be bringing up “WHAT ABOUT THE CHILDREN” to win your argument. It’s called a red hearing. At the route of this is the Catholic church trying to impose their morality on those who don’t share it. Freedom of religion is a two way street.
So by all means, run away in loss again.
No, that would be a “herring” but I digress.
You are right about the two way street and Obama trying to impose HIS morality, or lack thereof, on the Cathoic church is what is being pointed out. So thank you for making my point for me.