Yea…right…here’s a tip, if you want to put forth your message then perhaps you should start your points with somehting a little more nuanced then a one sentance “grunt/rant” that proves nothing more than your ignorance. Like perhaps: “Eric, I think your characterization of Romney as Daniel from the Karate Kid is very telling, you seem to think he can do no wrong and he’s the hero? Why do you feel Obama is cheating? What has he done to cheat?” or something of that nature, buuuut…that would be way too much for your mental capacity to put into words so all we get are attacks and misrepresentations of others opinions on issues like censorship. Bottom line, put forth a message instead of single sentence long piece of tripe along with your projected feelings of inadequacy.
I’m not about to discuss with you any issues if it’s just going to get deleted. What’s the point? Eric has made it clear that only views which agree with him are to be seen. It’s a sign of a very unstable (weak) person. Feeling the need to control your very thoughts.
It’s the kind of person that thinks the media is out to get him. Probably why the feature so prevalently in the comics. Opposing view? YOU MUST BE ONE OF THEM. Conspiracies abound!
All you have left is an echo chamber. Is that really what you want?
I’d love to post that list of straw-man cliches but it seems you added a filter for it. Thus I can’t post it.
You can’t take criticism so you delete and ban it. Then attack the person making it (ad hominem). Really just pathetic, Eric. You’re going right along with it Steve. It doesn’t make my criticism any less true. Only shows that you’re insecure.
Y’know, I actually *would* prefer an “echo chamber” full of political fellow-travelers (who agree with me on fundamentals but perhaps differ on particulars), to this present clusterfarg of standard-issue Anonygits fresh from Kos or DU or whatever other DNC-subsidized rock they’ve crawled out of. At least the former audience would have something more substantive to offer on the subject of, say, Paul Ryan, than Eddie Munster doppelganger jokes or he’s-gonna-push-old-ladies-off-cliffs vomit.
Nota bene: Allie’s a CONSERVATIVE editorial cartoonist. A rather creative person with a life, unlike those who think repeating creepy-stalkery “you seem tired” observations and sniggering about “binders” is some kind of awesomely enlightened commentary. And he actually spends his OWN money for this rather dubious “privilege” of seeing leftist Obamatons to publicly heap scorn upon his work. Frankly, if I owned this site and had his skillz/credentials, I’d happily “censor” all of you a-holes (even the very, VERY tiny minority that had actually had something worthwhile to say) into oblivion.
Because you really DON’T belong here. This is not your ‘scene’. And y’all shouldn’t be commenting on Eric’s work, any more than I’d waste my valuable time deconstructing Ted Rall’s latest badly-drawn piece of crap — er, I mean “art”.
How close to the mark am on you? On target, I know, otherwise you would have said something.”
Except I’m not defending myself. I don’t really care and you can call me whatever. Call me the Queen of England. It doesn’t change any of the criticism against you. That’s why ad hominem is a logical fallacy. It doesn’t change the argument and it’s why I don’t care.
It only shows what a weak, pathetic, insecure little man you are, Mr Allie.
RE: Inability to Distinguish Between 'Name' and 'Subject' Fields says:
You can be Liberal and a hack. Eric just happens to be conservative. One who deletes any form of criticism levied against him. Least of all attack the one who makes it. It’s why he’s a hack. Real artists don’t react this way.
Subscribe
The level of partisan has just reached a new level of BRAVERY. SO VERY BRAVE. Just wow.
Can’t be an English major.
!!! ~ Go Romneyson !
And I’m okay with censorship.
What makes you think I’m okay with censorship?
I’d respond to you Steve but my answer keeps getting deleted.
Yea…right…here’s a tip, if you want to put forth your message then perhaps you should start your points with somehting a little more nuanced then a one sentance “grunt/rant” that proves nothing more than your ignorance. Like perhaps: “Eric, I think your characterization of Romney as Daniel from the Karate Kid is very telling, you seem to think he can do no wrong and he’s the hero? Why do you feel Obama is cheating? What has he done to cheat?” or something of that nature, buuuut…that would be way too much for your mental capacity to put into words so all we get are attacks and misrepresentations of others opinions on issues like censorship. Bottom line, put forth a message instead of single sentence long piece of tripe along with your projected feelings of inadequacy.
I’m not about to discuss with you any issues if it’s just going to get deleted. What’s the point? Eric has made it clear that only views which agree with him are to be seen. It’s a sign of a very unstable (weak) person. Feeling the need to control your very thoughts.
It’s the kind of person that thinks the media is out to get him. Probably why the feature so prevalently in the comics. Opposing view? YOU MUST BE ONE OF THEM. Conspiracies abound!
All you have left is an echo chamber. Is that really what you want?
I’m actually saving these responses in a text file. As it would not be outside the bounds of reason for Eric to delete all of this. He has before.
But he’s not at all obsessive and creepy. Nope.
Please don’t climb that clock tower….
Please don’t climb that clock tower….
I’d love to post that list of straw-man cliches but it seems you added a filter for it. Thus I can’t post it.
You can’t take criticism so you delete and ban it. Then attack the person making it (ad hominem). Really just pathetic, Eric. You’re going right along with it Steve. It doesn’t make my criticism any less true. Only shows that you’re insecure.
Ad hominem? What you’re not creepy?
How close to the mark am on you? On target, I know, otherwise you would have said something.
Y’know, I actually *would* prefer an “echo chamber” full of political fellow-travelers (who agree with me on fundamentals but perhaps differ on particulars), to this present clusterfarg of standard-issue Anonygits fresh from Kos or DU or whatever other DNC-subsidized rock they’ve crawled out of. At least the former audience would have something more substantive to offer on the subject of, say, Paul Ryan, than Eddie Munster doppelganger jokes or he’s-gonna-push-old-ladies-off-cliffs vomit.
Nota bene: Allie’s a CONSERVATIVE editorial cartoonist. A rather creative person with a life, unlike those who think repeating creepy-stalkery “you seem tired” observations and sniggering about “binders” is some kind of awesomely enlightened commentary. And he actually spends his OWN money for this rather dubious “privilege” of seeing leftist Obamatons to publicly heap scorn upon his work. Frankly, if I owned this site and had his skillz/credentials, I’d happily “censor” all of you a-holes (even the very, VERY tiny minority that had actually had something worthwhile to say) into oblivion.
Because you really DON’T belong here. This is not your ‘scene’. And y’all shouldn’t be commenting on Eric’s work, any more than I’d waste my valuable time deconstructing Ted Rall’s latest badly-drawn piece of crap — er, I mean “art”.
“Ad hominem? What you’re not creepy?
How close to the mark am on you? On target, I know, otherwise you would have said something.”
Except I’m not defending myself. I don’t really care and you can call me whatever. Call me the Queen of England. It doesn’t change any of the criticism against you. That’s why ad hominem is a logical fallacy. It doesn’t change the argument and it’s why I don’t care.
It only shows what a weak, pathetic, insecure little man you are, Mr Allie.
You can be Liberal and a hack. Eric just happens to be conservative. One who deletes any form of criticism levied against him. Least of all attack the one who makes it. It’s why he’s a hack. Real artists don’t react this way.